May 17
Thursday
image image
OFCC Sues City of Cleveland Heights, Ohio The sign you see here is posted in Cleveland Heights Parks implying possession of a firearm is a crime. On Friday August 12th, 2011 Ohioans For Concealed Carry Filed a lawsuit against the City the City of Cleveland Heights. The litigation comes after many attempts to resolve concerns over laws that Cleveland Heights not only allowed to remain on their books, but also posted signs at their parks that continue to imply it is illegal to be armed. The City of Cleveland Heights has chosen to ignore our attempts at civil discourse. When individuals have contacted them representing themselves as residents of the City of Cleveland Heights their concerns apparently fell on deaf ears. When representatives of the organization have formally contacted the city's legal representation they've been laughed at and hung up on by the Law Director. It is this arrogance and refusal to work with Ohioans For Concealed Carry that has forced us to seek a remedy through the courts.
Our press release follows. Read the Full Story
Canton PD Event Leads to New OFCC Legislation When officer Harless of the Canton, Ohio police department came upon a vehicle stopped in the roadway most of us were focused on getting restaurant carry legislation signed into law. What took place that evening has become an international viral video, calls for the resignation of the City Council president, and criminal charges against a man who is clearly heard trying to state that he has a license. Ohioans For Concealed Carry has not just raised thousands of dollars in a legal defense fund, but we've written legislation to resolve this matter that Representative Danny Bubp has stated he's going to introduce this fall Read the Full Story

Search OhioCCW


Join OFCC Today!

Upcoming Events


2012 Party In The Park
When: August - TBD

Citizens in Cincinnati are praying for CCW

  • Print
Published on Wednesday, 30 November -0001 00:00
Written by Jeff Garvas
(Thread from Free Republic) Recently Cincinnati's lawsuit against gun manufacturers was thrown out. Having filed the suit in the first place, the implication is that Cincinnati is very hostile to gun owners and the right to self defense. It's my understanding that Ohio does not have concealed carry. (read more)

I have to wonder how many disarmed/unarmed people were hurt as a result of this position and how much property was destroyed because owners had no means to defend themselves.

Once again, the police lost control of a situation and did not protect the public. What I really don't understand is why it took three days to declare a curfew. Wasn't the first night of rioting a good time to impose a curfew?

Once again we have a perfect example of why an armed citizenry is absolutely essential.

If we can't count on the police, then we the people have to be prepared for a situation like this.