May
21
Monday
OFCC Sues City of Cleveland Heights, Ohio
The sign you see here is posted in Cleveland Heights Parks implying possession of a firearm is a crime.
On Friday August 12th, 2011 Ohioans For Concealed Carry Filed a lawsuit against the City the City of Cleveland Heights. The litigation comes after many attempts to resolve concerns over laws that Cleveland Heights not only allowed to remain on their books, but also posted signs at their parks that continue to imply it is illegal to be armed. The City of Cleveland Heights has chosen to ignore our attempts at civil discourse. When individuals have contacted them representing themselves as residents of the City of Cleveland Heights their concerns apparently fell on deaf ears. When representatives of the organization have formally contacted the city's legal representation they've been laughed at and hung up on by the Law Director. It is this arrogance and refusal to work with Ohioans For Concealed Carry that has forced us to seek a remedy through the courts.
Our press release follows. Read the Full Story
Our press release follows. Read the Full Story
Canton PD Event Leads to New OFCC Legislation
When officer Harless of the Canton, Ohio police department came upon a vehicle stopped in the roadway most of us were focused on getting restaurant carry legislation signed into law.
What took place that evening has become an international viral video, calls for the resignation of the City Council president, and criminal charges against a man who is clearly heard trying to state that he has a license.
Ohioans For Concealed Carry has not just raised thousands of dollars in a legal defense fund, but we've written legislation to resolve this matter that Representative Danny Bubp has stated he's going to introduce this fall
Read the Full Story
Letters to the Editor: Is Kerry trying to camouflage his gun position?
- Published on Wednesday, 30 November -0001 00:00
- Written by Jeff Garvas
October 27, 2004
Cleveland Plain Dealer
News organizations across the state and the nation fell head over heels to cover John Kerry's "hunting trip" in Ohio as if he were an avid hunter. Not a single news report called the event what it truly was: a photo opportunity intended to mislead the masses.
Bill Clinton claimed the National Rifle Association cost Al Gore the 2000 election. Kerry's campaign is well aware of this and is making every effort to mislead gun owners. Unions are telling their members that "John Kerry won't take your gun," knowing full well that Kerry has an anti-gun voting history.
Kerry is endorsed by every major anti-gun special interest group, including the Brady Campaign, previously known as Handgun Control Inc. Kerry is also endorsed by PETA, the animal rights group that wants to eliminate hunting entirely. Is that why he didn't carry his supposed kill?
John Kerry should be sent hunting for a new job by gun-owning union members who have been betrayed by the candidate and their union leadership.
Jeff Garvas, Cleveland
Garvas is president of Ohioans for Concealed Carry.
Click on the "Read More..." link below for a second letter to the PD editor from a member of the "head-in-the-sand" crowd..
Regarding the Oct. 22 story "Cheney scoffs at Kerry hunting trip":
Vice President Dick "Potty Mouth" Cheney poked fun at Sen. John Kerry's goose-hunting trip. Cheney argued that "the image of a gun-toting, camouflaged Democrat was an October disguise that masked his voting record against gun rights."
Mr. V.P., did you notice that Sen. Kerry used a shotgun and not a semi-automatic assault rifle? And did you notice that he hit the goose with one shot?
I don't think Sen. Kerry is anti-gun. Or maybe it's just that the vice president was never in the military and does not know the difference between an automatic rifle and a shotgun.
Duane Beck
Shaker Heights
Commentary:
Newsflash, Duane - Mr. Kerry isn't just trying to ban semi-automatic assault rifles. He is a co-sponsor of S. 1431, which is under consideration in the Senate right now. S 1431, if made law, would ban the Remington 11-87 Kerry sported at a September photo op in West Virginia, along with your grandfather's M1 Garand or Carbine, most if not all of your favorite semi-auto shotguns, and collector guns like the Browning Auto-5.
Saying you don't think Sen. Kerry is anti-gun is like saying you don't think Ted Kennedy enjoys whiskey sours. There is far too much evidence to the contrary, sir.
And this is just for starters.
Why don't you know this, Duane? Well assuming you actually don't, it's because the wool has been pulled over your eyes by strategists using a ploy developed by billionaire anti-gunner Andrew McKelvey.
Try pulling that wool off, by reading this:
John Kerry`s Voting Record on Second Amendment and Hunting Issues
and this:
John Kerry's ''sensible gun control'' not working in Great Britain
and this:
Kerry's Debate Comments Draw Fire
and this:
Kerry shotgun still in WV; Democrat hasn't bothered taking steps to bring home
and this:
A Message From the President about John Kerry...
and this:
All You Need To Know About John Kerry's Stance on Guns
and this:
AFGS: Wolf in Sheeps' Clothing
ONLINE POLL:
Will John Kerry's abysmal voting record on guns influence your vote?



