May 23
Wednesday
image image
OFCC Sues City of Cleveland Heights, Ohio The sign you see here is posted in Cleveland Heights Parks implying possession of a firearm is a crime. On Friday August 12th, 2011 Ohioans For Concealed Carry Filed a lawsuit against the City the City of Cleveland Heights. The litigation comes after many attempts to resolve concerns over laws that Cleveland Heights not only allowed to remain on their books, but also posted signs at their parks that continue to imply it is illegal to be armed. The City of Cleveland Heights has chosen to ignore our attempts at civil discourse. When individuals have contacted them representing themselves as residents of the City of Cleveland Heights their concerns apparently fell on deaf ears. When representatives of the organization have formally contacted the city's legal representation they've been laughed at and hung up on by the Law Director. It is this arrogance and refusal to work with Ohioans For Concealed Carry that has forced us to seek a remedy through the courts.
Our press release follows.
Read the Full Story
Canton PD Event Leads to New OFCC Legislation When officer Harless of the Canton, Ohio police department came upon a vehicle stopped in the roadway most of us were focused on getting restaurant carry legislation signed into law. What took place that evening has become an international viral video, calls for the resignation of the City Council president, and criminal charges against a man who is clearly heard trying to state that he has a license. Ohioans For Concealed Carry has not just raised thousands of dollars in a legal defense fund, but we've written legislation to resolve this matter that Representative Danny Bubp has stated he's going to introduce this fall Read the Full Story

Search OhioCCW


Join OFCC Today!

Upcoming Events


2012 Party In The Park
When: August - TBD

Real-estate investor avoids ''no-guns'' Fifth Third


To OFCC,

In light of your recent posting on your web site about Fifth Third's profits falling, I thought you might find my story about their bank relevant to this discussion. I am currently in the process of starting a new real-estate investment company. We are in the process of getting pre-qualified for the loans we'll need to purchase our first investment property.

My mortgage broker gave me the name of a loan officer at Fifth Third and another bank to contact. Just out of curiosity, I called the Fifth Third contact and left her a voice mail. I told her I might be interested in applying for my loan there, but only if they don't display those discriminatory signs at her branch. I told her if they do they were probably wasting their time to even call me back. I explained that I was an OFCC member and that I would not do business with them so long as those signs were present.

The next day she called back. I wasn't home but my wife took the call. She told my wife (paraphrasing) "we certainly don't want people with guns in our buildings, because of recent robberies, a burglary and a murder". My wife wasn't 100% sure she said "murder", but she's pretty sure she said that. She also said (paraphrasing) "most banks have those signs up".

I called her back that evening but got her voice mail. I left her another message where I made the following points:

1. There are 44,000+ CHL permit holders in Ohio and there hasn't been a single incident involving them doing something criminal or improper in any business.

2. Fifth Third has been robbed several times in spite of their "no guns" signs, so they obviously are useless.

3. When they disarm their customers inside their buildings, they also leave them vulnerable when going to/from their parking lots.

I again reiterated that I would not do business with them until those signs come down.

Right now it might be easy for them to dismiss our business as not much of a loss because we're just getting started. However, we will build this business into a multi-million dollar business in the long term. I have asked our mortgage brokers to avoid contacting Fifth Third for all future loans. I've also asked my realtor to avoid showing me any properties that Fifth Third owns as an REO.

In the long run their ignorant policy is going to end up costing them many thousands of dollars in lost business with us if they don't change their ways. I will also try to get the word out to other investors, contractors, etc. as I network with them in the months to come to avoid Fifth Third for the same reason I am. Thanks.

Gary Martin, President
Sparkling Homes, L. L. C.
Gahanna, Ohio

Related Stories:
''No-guns'' Fifth Third profit falls 6 percent in first quarter

''No-guns'' Fifth Third bank earnings down 60%; competitors' up

Fifth Third Bank: Lost another loan to common sense!

OFCC uncovers report of Fifth Third customer being robbed on exit from bank

Fifth Third: Signs not posted to keep criminals out; They want to keep YOU out