May
24
Thursday
OFCC Sues City of Cleveland Heights, Ohio
The sign you see here is posted in Cleveland Heights Parks implying possession of a firearm is a crime.
On Friday August 12th, 2011 Ohioans For Concealed Carry Filed a lawsuit against the City the City of Cleveland Heights. The litigation comes after many attempts to resolve concerns over laws that Cleveland Heights not only allowed to remain on their books, but also posted signs at their parks that continue to imply it is illegal to be armed. The City of Cleveland Heights has chosen to ignore our attempts at civil discourse. When individuals have contacted them representing themselves as residents of the City of Cleveland Heights their concerns apparently fell on deaf ears. When representatives of the organization have formally contacted the city's legal representation they've been laughed at and hung up on by the Law Director. It is this arrogance and refusal to work with Ohioans For Concealed Carry that has forced us to seek a remedy through the courts.
Our press release follows. Read the Full Story
Our press release follows. Read the Full Story
Canton PD Event Leads to New OFCC Legislation
When officer Harless of the Canton, Ohio police department came upon a vehicle stopped in the roadway most of us were focused on getting restaurant carry legislation signed into law.
What took place that evening has become an international viral video, calls for the resignation of the City Council president, and criminal charges against a man who is clearly heard trying to state that he has a license.
Ohioans For Concealed Carry has not just raised thousands of dollars in a legal defense fund, but we've written legislation to resolve this matter that Representative Danny Bubp has stated he's going to introduce this fall
Read the Full Story
Senator Explains Need for CCW Reform
- Published on Tuesday, 19 December 2006 15:48
- Written by Mike Kinsey
While much of the media throughout the state of Ohio is still reporting on the utter shock of unnecessary legislation that was brutally forced into law by evil gun lobbyists after a mere fifteen months of intense deliberation and numerous committee and floor debates, Senator John Carey (R 17th District) has published an article in The Chillicothe Gazette to help explain the rationale behind the Legislatures actions:
When our Founding Fathers set out to establish the governing laws of this nation, much debate centered on the importance of individual freedom. These early leaders recognized that in order to build and maintain a successful society, government power must be limited, citizens must be engaged and every person should be guaranteed certain unalienable rightsIn his introduction, Senator Carey eloquently summarizes the big picture for everyone. We have spent months discussing the important details of HB347. This should not preclude us from remembering now and then what we are really fighting for: the fact that our right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed even if we happen to live in Columbus, OH.
Most of us learn about the Constitution in school and, over time, grow to appreciate the rights and privileges this important document grants us. However, on occasion, there have been some who have questioned the merit of these freedoms and have done their best to restrict them. In particular, a number of anti-gun activists have fought hard over the years to place restrictions on our 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms. In the midst of this struggle, the Ohio General Assembly has taken a number of important steps to ensure law-abiding citizens are able to exercise their Constitutional rights.
The honorable Senator continued by proving why unnecessary firearm restrictions upon the law-abiding are not only morally unjust, but logically unjust as well:
Before the [oringinal concealed carry] bill went into effect, opponents predicted violent crime would increase, but the reality is that since we passed the law, more than 85,000 Ohioans have obtained concealed-carry permits and there has been no evidence that our communities are any less safe than before.Yes, preemption was needed so that state-issued Concealed Handgun Licenses can be utilized uniformly throughout the state. Yes, nullifying the onerous plain sight requirement for motor vehicles was just as necessary. However, while we are chiseling away these smaller milestones, we must now and then step back and admire the ongoing sculpture that firearm advocates are creating when attempting to restore their innate and Constitutionally protected right to keep and bear arms for their security.
In fact, evidence shows concealed-carry permit holders have actually prevented crime. A recent article in the Columbus Dispatch highlighted a case in which the president of the Central Ohio Crime Stoppers, who happens to be a concealed-carry permit holder, was able to fend off an attacker by simply pointing his unloaded weapon at the assailant. Despite what opponents have said, the lack of incidents since concealed carry became law is proof gun violence comes from criminals, not law-abiding citizens who are properly trained and permitted.



