|
Written by Mike Kinsey
|
|
Tuesday, 17 October 2006 08:45 |
As another election draws near, it is important to remember why every gun owner must get themselves, their family, and their friends to the polls. Alan Korwin, distinguished author of several books focusing on the political climate concerning firearms, is helping to remind us. He has reproduced The Left Wings Gun Plans describing goals of certain political leaders' plans to further erode our firearm rights. He claims that the list of goals was widely circulated during the Clinton Administration and was adopted as a Five Year Plan. Voting the wrong people into office next month could set this Five Year Plan into motion. How would you feel about some of the items on this list that have been included below: |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Jeff Garvas
|
|
Tuesday, 17 October 2006 06:02 |
Ohioans For Concealed Carry recently filed a Merit Brief in support of our appeal of the Clyde decision to the Sixth District Appellate Court. Ohio Attorney General Jim Petro's Office, an original intervenor in the case, filed a brief supporting the appeal and joined OFCC asking the court to reach a different conclusion than they did in Beatty.
Although the issue in this case is the same, Appellant respectfully asks this Court to again consider the arguments made herein, and to reach a different conclusion...
Although a conflicting decision is unlikely Ohioans For Concealed Carry is seeking a speedy decision by the Sixth District so that our case can be appealed to the Ohio Supreme Court, and if possible, joined with the Beatty appeal.
Legal Briefs: OFCC Clyde Appeal & AG Clyde Brief |
|
Written by Daniel White
|
|
Sunday, 15 October 2006 14:20 |
The appeal to the Ohio Supreme Court in the Beatty v. Toledo case has been filed by OFCC attorney Daniel Ellis.
The next step will be for the OSC to decide whether or not to hear the appeal.
Click here to read the Memorandum in Support of Jurisdiction |
|
Written by Daniel White
|
|
Saturday, 14 October 2006 15:13 |
In the latest news in the Dan Sayers case, the Motion to Reconsider and Clarify has been denied by the Oregon Municipal Court.
Sayers' attorney, Daniel Ellis, had filed a motion with the court to dismiss the charges, which was denied. Ellis then filed a Motion to Reconsider and Clarify alleging that the court did not address three issues:
1)Sayers was the subject of a felony stop and that the requirement to inform police he was carrying a firearm would have been self-incrimination and a violation of his Fifth Amendment Rights
2)The Oregon ordinance prohibiting carrying of all firearms is unconstitutional
3)The distinction of carrying open vs. concealed
The Court's response to these three allegations was less than stellar. |
|
Read more...
|
|
Written by Joanna K.
|
|
Wednesday, 11 October 2006 09:33 |
As a woman, I must confess that I used to depend on my husband for much of my safety. My husband has had his Ohio Concealed Handgun License for some time. My husband prepares for emergencies and trains to deal with potential situations. My husband keeps our shotgun for home defense within easy reach at night. My husband meticulously cleans our firearms, buys the best ammunition, and practices on a regular basis. My husband locks up our house each night, sets the alarm, and sleeps closest to the bedroom door.
While he does an excellent job of taking care of me, I realize that he is not with me 24 hours a day. While I depend on him for so much in my life, the fact remains that I still have to depend on myself. Similarly, when we have children of our own, they also will depend on me and me alone.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 Next > End >>
|
