|
Jack D'Aurora, a Columbus lawyer, recently used the editorial page of the Columbus Dispatch to unleash a vacuous rant against concealed carry.
The editorial is so full of anti-rights bigotry, fallacy, doubletalk, out-of-context quotes from long-debunked studies, adolescent gamesmanship, and lies that we'd need 5 times the space allotted to the "Idiot of the Day" feature just to write the introduction to a rebuttal.
Nevertheless, let me give you one quick but nicely representative example of D'Aurora's brilliance: "Concealed-carry laws also make police work more difficult. Illinois does not have a concealed-carry law. [A study] states that police see this as a powerful tool for taking criminals off the street."
After you catch your breath, you start to get a feeling for D'Aurora's alternate reality: The denial of gun rights in Illinois has taken criminals off the streets of Chicago and made that city safer. The Illinois concealed carry ban is so effective that other states ought to copy the program. And of course, gun laws should exist for the convenience of the police.
My reality goes like this: Illinois is now the only state in the nation without a concealed carry permit process, and Chicago is the most dangerous city in America, teeming with criminals and illegal guns. Further, gun laws don't need to be designed to accommodate the police; the right to bear arms is a Constitutionally enumerated, basic human right.
If D'Aurora, a lawyer, wants to ramp-up his public profile, he ought to find a better way than puking up a hackneyed, bigoted rant in the Columbus Dispatch. What an Idiot.
UPDATE, AUG. 6, 2011: The half-baked study that D'Aurora quoted has been discredited again. The Courier-News (a Chicago-area newspaper owned by the Chicago Sun Times) ran a news feature on Aug. 6 titled, "Local Police Give Support to Concealed Carry."
The article stated: "Of the dozen area law enforcement leaders contacted by the Courier-News, none said they opposed concealed carry."
D'Aurora has gone beyond running afoul of the Second Amendment rights movement. He's guilty of intellectual dishonesty and anti-rights bigotry.
What an Idiot.
UPDATE, AUG. 7, 2011: Preeminent scholar and author John Lott has published a rebuttal to D'Aurora in the Columbus Dispatch, here. |