|
Supreme Court Oral Arguments Wednesday |
|
|
|
|
Latest News
|
|
Written by Jeff Garvas
|
|
Monday, 07 April 2008 |
|
Live Video Stream Wednesday @ 9:00am (OFCC Scheduled 9:30am) Requires Real Player!
The seven justices that fill these seats will soon hear oral arguments in Ohioans For Concealed Carry v. City of Clyde. On Wednesday April 9th at 9:30am attorneys from Attorney General Marc Dann's office and Ohioans For Concealed Carry will take sides on behalf of Ohio's law abiding gun owners. This case began in 2004 when the City of Clyde passed an emergency ordinance and enacted a gun ban against concealed handgun license holders in their city parks. After the city flat out ignored our requests to discuss the situation OFCC was forced to sue. Due to another criminal case (Beatty) in the same district our judge held our case back before oral arguments ever began. When Beatty lost his case and the appeals court ruled against him our judge ruled against us based on Beatty precedent. We appealed, and thanks to HB347 becoming law, we advised the court of relevant changes to Ohio law in HB347 that impacted our case. They concurred and ruled in our favor, prompting Clyde to appeal to the Ohio Supreme Court. In a rare move Ohioans For Concealed Carry agreed that the Ohio Supreme Court should take up the case and decide the issue on a statewide basis. Since we started this case the issue was about park bans, but it has evolved into a much greater issue. We believe that the issue of firearms laws are so significant and must be so consistent that they have become an issue of statewide concern. |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
OFCC PAC 2008 Fun 'n Gun A Blast - Literally! |
|
|
|
|
Latest News
|
|
Written by Jeff Garvas
|
|
Monday, 07 April 2008 |
|
The weather couldn't have been nicer at 70 degrees with no noticeable humidity and the very rare breeze in the late afternoon. John Benner's staff at the Tactical Defense Institute and the IDPA volunteers couldn't have been more prepared for what was about to take place either.
All told about 90 people converged on the facility Sunday and shot in excess of 20,000 rounds in IDPA styled self-defense scenarios as well as TDI designed shooting instruction involving steel plates. To top the live fire courses off TDI instructors put participants through a live fire house with soft air pistols and simulated two real-work shooting situations, leaving the student to react with no prior guidance. Many people continue to comment on how well this taught them how much more training they wish to pursue. All proceeds went to OFCC's Political Action Committee. In our discussion forums, at OhioCCWForums.org, the discussion continues and participants seemed to have a great time. Numerous photos of the event can be found at http://gallery.ohioccw.org -- and if you took some you'd like to contribute to our gallery please get in touch with us. |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Latest News
|
|
Written by Daniel White
|
|
Sunday, 06 April 2008 |
The Knox Report
From the Firearms Coalition
By Jeff Knox
(25 March, 2008) Now that people have had an opportunity to hear and read the transcript of the oral arguments in the DC gun ban case (links are available at FirearmsCoalition.org,) there is much righteous indignation about some of the comments of Alan Gura, lead council for the pro-rights side. During his thirty minute presentation, Mr. Gura made a number of excellent points and generally handled himself admirably, but under questioning by Justice Breyer, Gura stated that, “the government can ban arms that are not appropriate for civilian use. There is no question of that.” He went on to defend that position as being consistent with the Court’s holding in the Miller case because in that case the Court stated, speaking of the militia, that, “when called for service these men were expected to appear bearing arms supplied by themselves and of the kind in common use at the time.”
Both Gura and Justice Scalia used the phrase, “common use at the time,” to support a position that machineguns, such as the selective fire M16’s that have been standard issue for the U.S. military and National Guard for the past three decades, would not be “protected” by the Second Amendment because such weapons are not very “common” among civilians. This argument is clearly specious because the only reason these guns are not much more common is that the government instituted a ban on any new guns being allowed to be privately sold. Since the semi-auto version of the M16, the AR-15, is the most popular rifle in the country, it is not a stretch to suggest that the selective fire version would also find a broad market – if government regulations did not forbid their sale.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
OFCC Testifies in Support of Castle Doctrine |
|
|
|
|
Latest News
|
|
Written by Gary Witt
|
|
Thursday, 03 April 2008 |
OFCC member Gary Witt was one of two witnesses testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee in support of Senate Bill 184 (Castle Doctrine) on April 2, 2008. The Committee also heard from Students For Concealed Carry member Steve Feltoon in support of the bill and from two opponents of the bill. Testifying against the bill were representatives of the Ohio Prosecuting Attorney Association and the Ohio Association of Chiefs of Police.
Witt reports that the committee seemed favorable to the bill, asking tough questions of the representatives of the Ohio Prosecuting Attorney Association and the Ohio Association of Chiefs of Police.
Today’s hearing was the fourth for the bill. A substitute bill was scheduled to be presented at this hearing for consideration but was not ready according to committee chair Senator Timothy Grendell. It will be introduced at a future, yet to be determined, hearing date.
The Senate Judiciary Committee normally meets on Wednesdays although not every week. Committee meeting schedules are posted on Friday afternoons for the following week at this link.
The complete text of Witt’s testimony is below:
Mr. Chairman, members of the Committee, good morning. My name is Gary Witt and I am here today speaking on behalf of Ohioans For Concealed Carry, Incorporated. OFCC is a proponent of this long overdue legislation and has asked me to address the committee today. Thank you for giving me the opportunity to do this.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Ammo Reloading Forum Section |
|
|
|
|
Latest News
|
|
Written by Todd Coughlin
|
|
Tuesday, 01 April 2008 |
As the popularity of the discussion boards at Ohioans for Concealed Carry has grown the cost of cartridges has kept a parallel pace. OFCC proudly announces a new “area” on the discussion boards for hand loading or “reloading” cartridges.
This “area” on our forum compliments other topics such as: Criminal Protection Zones, Politics, CCW Encounters, Firearms and Gear, and much, much more.
The discussion boards can be found at www.OhioCCWForums.org. Once you create a “screen name” or “handle” you will have forum member access to areas that are not viewable without an ID (such as the For Sale classifieds). |
|
|
Tallmadge City Removing Illegal "No Guns" Signs |
|
|
|
|
Latest News
|
|
Written by Jeff Garvas
|
|
Saturday, 29 March 2008 |
|
Recently we received a submission from OFCC supporter B. Clark showing just how powerful well written letters can convince public officials of their innocent mistakes. Thanks for Mike Kinsey's article Hamilton Township Removing Illegal "No Guns" signs! I used this same letter to inform the Tallmadge City law Director of Public Service to relocate the gun signs in our parks to the building locations.
It's always great to hear when others can reproduce success with the same initial effort. This isn't the first time OFCC or someone who has recreated what OFCC had done has been successful in this very same manner. If your local government is posting illegal signs that prohibit concealed carry where they shouldn't pick up the phone and start making noise -- just do it professionally and calmly, making your point without threatening to sue or seek OFCC's involvement.
When presented with the facts most officials will realize what they or others in their community have done wrong and rectify the situation. The individual from Tallmadge further asked: If these signs get posted on open air type picnic pavilions (a roof covering picnic tables with no enclosed sides), are these considered buildings?
The unfortunate answer is we just can't tell you. In some cases or legal definitions these structures are considered buildings. In other cases they require four walls to be deemed a building. The unfortunate problem here is that if they are posted or not, if a court considers them to be government buildings, you have no excuse for being within them. The way Ohio's sign law works you must "know" that you entered a posted private business to be guilty, but when it comes to government buildings the lack of a conspicuous sign is irrelevant. Enter community picnic shelters at your own risk. |
|
|
DC v Heller - Rule or Remand? |
|
|
|
|
Latest News
|
|
Written by Gene Helms
|
|
Monday, 17 March 2008 |
U.S. Solicitor General Paul Clement has filed a brief for the imminent Supreme Court case District of Columbia v. Heller that will allow the highest court in the land to rule whether or not the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is an individual right like every other that is enumerated in the Bill of Rights. Clement asked that the case be remanded to the DC Circuit Court to see if the law can withstand “intermediate scrutiny” under the Second Amendment. His reasoning is that,
Although the Court of Appeals correctly held that the Second Amendment protects an individual right, it did not apply the correct standard for evaluating respondent’s Second Amendment claim.
The Court of Appeals appears to be using a categorical approach where Second Amendment could be construed to categorically preclude any ban on a category of “Arms” that can be traced back to the founding era of our nation. If the Supreme Court of the United States were to analyze this case in the same way, it could cast doubt on the constitutionality of existing federal legislation banning the possession of certain types of firearms, including machine guns.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>
|
| Results 15 - 21 of 3897 |