| Sayers: Motion To Dimiss Denied |
|
|
|
| Written by Jeff Garvas | |
| Tuesday, 19 September 2006 | |
|
In the latest result out of the Oregon Courts the judge has ruled against Daniel Ellis' motion to dismiss. As we reported earlier, Using the Sixth District Ruling For Dismissal, the Ellis argued that since the Sixth District Court ruled that the concealed carry law is not a general law it is not feasible for the prosecutor in Sayers' to argue that their "complete ban" on firearms is only partial due to the general law nature of HB12. Confused? The Oregon, Ohio ordinance bans "all firearms", and since the Sixth District Court of Appeals ruled that HB12 is no longer a general law, and since the Beatty court found that an ordinance banning the, “carry (of) firearms of any description” banned the carry of all weapons, concealed or not the Oregon, Ohio court should agree that what they are dealing with is nothing short of a complete prohibition on firearms. That, in and of itself, would be unconstitutional in Ohio if the courts would actually agree to play by the same rule book. Be sure to read the order denying the Motion to Dismiss |