| Hang Together or Hang Separately |
|
|
|
| Written by Jeff Riley | |
| Thursday, 20 December 2007 | |
|
Those of us who enjoy firearms for both self-defense and hunting are a little frustrated. What we are frustrated about is the attitude among some firearms enthusiasts that, “As long as the anti-gunners aren't clamoring to take away my (insert gun of choice), I don't care if they ban (insert boogeyman -- .50cal, 'assault' weapons, etc)”. Well, now the chickens have come home to roost. I have seen an increase in both tone and substance in “banning firearms that can penetrate body armor”. We know that that includes most deer rifles. Now this: Gunman used hunting skills at Omaha mall Couple this with the moronic response of people who like this doctor have no problem forgiving the SHOOTER: Doctor Calls for Ban of Assault Weapons The hunting community needs to wake up. What you call your Granddad's deer rifle, the Violence Policy Center calls an “intermediate sniper rifle” and of course wants to ban them. What is an intermediate sniper rifle, you ask? By their definition, any rifle with an optical sight allowing the user to shoot at distances of 100 meters or greater. Which is pretty much any rifle used to hunt varmints and big game in the United States. Not all hunters are asleep, but a large portion are. Please help us in stopping these gun-grabbers whenever they rear their heads to spread false information. Make no mistake, they are coming for all of our guns. Mr. Riley is an OFCC member that lives in Southwest Ohio. When not working with computers, he enjoys outdoor sports such as fishing, hiking, and of course, shooting. |